Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prelude2cinema

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, even if I count User:Jcuk. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Prelude2cinema

Advertising for possible nn company, created by a user with the same name. QQ 01:06, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable. Tom Harrison ^(talk) 04:08, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Thesquire 06:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Bkwillwm 07:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• KEEP and improve. nn is not wiki policy, and even if it were, 21,200 hits for the company and 1,560 for the man on Google seem pretty noticable to me.Jcuk 00:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Counting Google hits is not research. If your Google search turned up something that demonstrates that this company satisfies the WP:CORP criteria, please tell us what it is. Uncle G 18:57, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • "Non-notable" is shorthand for "is not notable enough to be encyclopaedic". WP:NOT an infodump. Please put more effort into your arguments, if this one is representative of what you plan on coming out with in the future. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Jcuk. -- JJay 19:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:CORP --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.