Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predaptive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. Sango123 01:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Predaptive
Also listing the following articles:
- Structured Training
- SalesPathways
- Prospero Barn
Advertisements for non-notable companies and the building that houses them, all fail WP:CORP. Structured Training hints at coining the term "structured training", but no evidence of this. --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Zero nexis hits, and zero ABI/Inform hits (which has a better database of U.K. papers). Begone with the lot of 'em. Uucp 02:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all there's a very marginal case for redirecting Predaptive to Preadaptation for the typographically impaired. Opabinia regalis 05:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind, that's even worse than I thought. Persistently read the title as "preadaptive". Opabinia regalis 05:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom, they all fail WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 07:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. The articles here all smell of pork per WP:SPAM. No evidence they pass WP:CORP. They appear to be one operation who has registered shells under many different aliases, and have listed themselves with almost every business and training directory under the sun. No Alexa rank for structuredtraining.com (and none also for sister companies learningworld.com and proskill.co.uk); those for salespathways and predaptive rank in the 5.4 millionth. The Salespathway site has 6 links to; Predaptive has 4; learningworld has 2; structuredtraining has 6. There is a circular pattern here, as they all link to each other. Prospero Barn is a building, and not a notable one at that, common point of all the above.Ohconfucius 02:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom - advertising. Nigel (Talk) 12:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.