Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powermuff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. This article didn't deserve such attention, should have been {{prod}}ded. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 02:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Powermuff

A neologism with a dicdef that's unsuitable for Wiktionary. Delete, no transwiki. King of Hearts | (talk) 02:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep The only legitimate reason I see for deletion amoung your comments is the last entry. "Whether its tasteful or not is irrelevant...No indication the word's in any kind of general use." I understand this.

However, the rest of you pseudo intellectuals should be ashamed of yourselves. Telling me I need to undergo testosterone reduction therapy, that this isn't an "urban" encyclopedia, and that wikipedia is not a locker room is totally obscene.

Shame on you! As keepers of Wikipedia you should not launch personal attacks on people who submit articles. You should judge each entry on its own merit as opposed to whether you think the user is a jerk. I read the comments and I think what a shame it is that you call yourselves intellectuals. Get over yourselves people!

Now, I do not like being vulgar here, but just listen to a few of the entries I have found. And now look at your petty comments and see if you still believe my entry is "locker room" status. Shame!

From Wikipedia (again I apologize...these are from your dictionary)

Fuck, Pussy (yes the slang term), Cunt, asshole, motherfucker, fingering (sexual act), Anal Fingering (do u believe this is in there???).

And get this one:

-A footjob (often shortened to "FJ") is also called a "toejob," "solejob" and "heeljob." Regardless of what part of the foot is used, it is often referred to as a footjob. The most common example of this involves someone placing both of their feet on their male partner's penis and stroking it continuously until he ejaculates on their feet, although they can also perform a footjob with only one foot. Multiple people can also perform a footjob on the same male. For example, if two people are performing a footjob on one man, they are giving a "double-footjob." A footjob done by three people on the same man is called a "triple-footjob."

So back off and reevaluate yourselves, except Fan-1967 who actually seems to understand this isnt' a popularity contest.

Thank you. - unsigned comment by Bri jazz

• Delete Whether it's tasteful is irrelevant. ~500 ghits (mainly for porn videos) is non-notable. No indication the word's in any kind of general use. Fan1967 02:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary --djrobgordon 02:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WINAD and WP:NEO. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism. --Terence Ong 02:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per terence --Khoikhoi 03:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is an encyclopedia, not a locker room. --Elkman - ^(talk) 03:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. FreplySpang (talk) 04:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This an encyclopedia, not Roger's Profanisaurus. ProhibitOnions 10:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a dictionary.  (aeropagitica)  12:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Did "Roget's Profanisaurus" give anyone else a visual of a Triceratops stomping around and cussing fluently? No? Just me, then. Carry on. Oh, and delete.Regina0613 21:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and recommend testosterone reduction program for article's creator. BrownHairedGirl 00:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as neo per nom. Oh, and up Ms. Regina's medication. Kuru ^talk 01:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Vanity --Masssiveego 05:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Would have gone well in Sexual slang article if more people used it. Oscar Arias 05:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually now that I think about it, the term should be MERGEd to Sexual slang. Oscar Arias 05:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It does seem that the some of the deletes are coming from some sort of prudish stance based on the comments. Can we tone down the anti-sex terminology rhetoric??
    Remember Wikipedia is not censored. Oscar Arias 05:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Newyorktimescrossword 07:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Powerdelete! Brian G. Crawford 18:45, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.