Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porkrunk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Proto||type 12:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Porkrunk

Combination neologism and hoax. (Note: PROD tag removed by article creator) FreplySpang (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - Wikipedia articles need to be verifiable using reliable sources. FreplySpang (talk) 15:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

As a rich, white kid in Chicago I can definitely assure you that this is a word. There is a rather large community of people using this word and I think the fact that I can meet a total stranger at a party and hear them use this word warrants its having it's own entry.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.23.111.128 (talk • contribs).

• Delete zero google hits, nonsense protologism. Weregerbil 15:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per WP:V/WP:NEO. Google returns a big zero. --blue520 15:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as scoring the coveted zero Google hits of the archetypal protologism. Just zis Guy you know? 16:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. NN neologism; unverified. Bucketsofg 17:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO.--Isotope23 18:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.