Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Population cycle

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 00:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Population cycle

Original research at very least, and I'm still not going to be saving my nasal mucous. Denni☯ 02:38, 2005 August 25 (UTC)

• delete nonsense. -- WCFrancis 02:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep excellent article now. Good job, kudos to Capitalistroadster. -- WCFrancis 13:26, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Jaxl | talk 02:45, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Nice work, Capitalistroadster. Jaxl | talk 14:15, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep (changed vote from delete) following excellent rescue of nonsense of Capitalroadster. Alf 11:28, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Journalist ^{C.Image:Smilie.gif Holla @ me!}
• Keep — Its certainly looking more encyclopedic. Journalist ^{C.Image:Smilie.gif Holla @ me!}
• Comment It's nonsense at the moment but a valid subject for a legitimate article. For example, the Lemming article links there. Capitalistroadster 07:07, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I have rewritten the article so that it refers to population cycles. Capitalistroadster 10:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, rewritten article is excellent. Nice work Capitalistroadster! the wub "?/!" 11:09, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep agree with the wub Dlyons493 11:49, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• KEEP --Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 11:54, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Thanks to Capitalistroadster for re-writing it. --GraemeL ^(talk) 12:05, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, the rewrite looks pretty sound to me! Peeper 13:54, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• keep this, as pperos. Trollderella 16:41, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, like so many other things colaboration has turned it into something worthwhile HoratioVitero 17:31, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Note that every one of this user's edits, save for one minor edit to Bible, is to VfD. Zoe 04:18, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
• 'keep it is really rewritten nicely Yuckfoo 19:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Well done, sir. Ah, the beauty of VfD when it works! Removing my nomination. Denni☯ 23:57, 2005 August 25 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, close nomination please nice Mr (or Ms) admin. Proto t c 14:29, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.