Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poppin'
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect. - Mailer Diablo 13:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Poppin'
Neato song, but does it rate it's own article? This article has been speedied once already. Rklawton 18:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as deleted and reposted content (G4). --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 19:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Commment repost doesn't work for previously speeded articles. They need to go to AfD since reposting is basically a challenge to the speedy. Once an article is AfD'd then it's a whole different ballgame. Rklawton 19:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't think thats correct. That only applies if the article isn't still speedyable under other speedy criteria. This clause does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions, although in this case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy deletion criteria, may apply; when no criterion applies, the recreated page may not be speedied, but may be submitted to Articles for deletion or the appropriate XfD process. So if it was A7'ed before and nothing has been done to correct that A7 it can still be A7'ed, I believe. Syrthiss 19:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, if it's still A7 (etc), but the speedy nomination was for repost. But your clarification is well taken. You are quite right. Rklawton 20:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't think thats correct. That only applies if the article isn't still speedyable under other speedy criteria. This clause does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions, although in this case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy deletion criteria, may apply; when no criterion applies, the recreated page may not be speedied, but may be submitted to Articles for deletion or the appropriate XfD process. So if it was A7'ed before and nothing has been done to correct that A7 it can still be A7'ed, I believe. Syrthiss 19:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- how about a Speedy Redirect to Chris Whatshisname, since otherwise I'm going to delete it as recreated content (with even less info than the deleted content)? Syrthiss 19:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Seconded per Syrthiss Rklawton 22:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- As is, delete per WP:V/WP:CR. If verifiable, then merge/redirect as above. -AED 06:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
