This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 02:45, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
The article does not establish notability. The name doesn't seem particularly unique, either. RickK 07:52, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
delete non notable, not encyclopedic. also could be possibly confusing with such a generic name cohesion 07:57, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
delete not encyclopedic --Henrygb 10:59, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Nonsense. Mirror Vax 12:46, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
Delete - not notable - Tεxτurε 15:51, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.