Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poleagraphy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Robert 18:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Poleagraphy

Neologism that someone seems to have made up in school one day. No google hits. (Poleography gets 6). —Lamentation :( 11:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom; WP:NEO and WP:NFT--TBCTaLk?!? 11:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with a 10-foot pole. NawlinWiki 11:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme prejustice per nom. WegianWarrior 12:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nearly Headless Nick 12:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. PJM 12:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because flergle. Danny Lilithborne 01:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with a poleaxe. SM247^{My Talk} 01:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NFT and WP:NEO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.