Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pluma

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:15 (UTC)

[edit] Pluma

slang term You (Talk) 00:10, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, you barely beat me to it!-Splash 00:11, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

• A definition. Should be speedily deleted, not voted upon. ‡ Jarlaxle 00:12, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Ironically, I was hum-haahing over whether to speedy tag it or not. Which is hardly a speedy way for me to proceed!-Splash 00:12, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

I think that this SHOULD fit the speedy criteria, but I don't think it does, unfortunately. You (Talk) 00:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete neologism. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:18, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neoglism as stated above. Falphin 00:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: non-notable slang — Bcat (talk | email) 01:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --Wetman 02:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Pluma delete. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:50, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism dicdef. — Ливай | ☺ 06:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Ливай. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:33, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete slang neologism. JamesBurns 08:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete just a reminder that Wikipedia is not a slang guide: WP:WIN drini ☎ 21:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete same reason as Livi.~~~~ 11:43, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.