Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playstation 4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:07, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Playstation 4
Delete complete speculation. I don't think it qualifies for speedy (?). TheMidnighters 02:12, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, per nominator reasoning. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) | (contribs) 02:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball... --Mjvan12 02:15, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I believe this would qualify for speedy.--Kross 02:17, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. No meaningful content and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Pagrashtak 02:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously. K1Bond007 03:48, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. — JIP | Talk 05:08, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete A waste of space err memory. Srcrowl 05:51, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for all the obvious reasons. - Thatdog 05:53, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete speculation. JamesBurns 10:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete no please!--April12 10:59, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, a tad premature jamesgibbon 12:37, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Reminds me of Ali G's claim that he had the original idea of Playstation 2, because when the first one was released he said they should make a new one that's even better. -R. fiend 15:35, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete or we'll have the XBOX 540 articles, the GamePyramid and god knows what else. Rob Church 15:49, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - short article with little or no context, and speculation. --Idont Havaname 19:07, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as pure vandalism and speculation stub. --SuperDude 22:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete -- Will the article remain in this state for the next 5 years? Perhaps. - Longhair | Talk 03:52, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.