Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planetcricket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Planetcricket

Alexa rank 286,156. Created and primarily written by Duffarama, a staff member, a violation of WP:VANITY and is also self-promotion (WP:NOT). Other staff members have also contributed. Nothing links here, short of a couple userpages. Loaded with crufty information. Articles have been created on team members, that have either been speedied or userfied. Prodded a couple days ago. The tag was removed by an anon, who only addressed a rather small concern, and none of the rest. Drat (Talk) 05:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete frankly, I don't think it is notable enough with only 10,000 members. Wikipedia is not a web directory. Where ^(talk) 18:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Where.  RasputinAXP  c 20:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity adcruft. KillerChihuahua^?!? 20:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The members has been changed now to the updated 15000 members. What parts in particular do you deem as self promotional, the article on the history is unbiased.. 20:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.