Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pig 'N' Whistle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Hermione1980^{My RfA} 22:57, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pig 'N' Whistle

Not intended to be an article A bit iffy 20:59, 4 October 2005 (UTC) (PS: if you're the creator of the article, see Reference desk to ask a question.)--A bit iffy 21:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)In view of the rewrite by User:23skidoo, I now recommend keep, (or move to better-named article if more appropriate). --A bit iffy 04:46, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, expand, and cleanup a lot. If the NBC show Jesse gets a page, than this show does too. --CastAStone 22:31, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Legitimate TV show and no less worthy of an article than eTalk Daily. I'll expand it a bit. 24.71.223.140 01:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC) (vote actually by User:23skidoo - for some reason I got logged out).
  • Followup comment: I have rewritten the article to remove the first person content and make it a proper TV stub. Still needs to be categorized, plus it needs to be moved to The Pig and Whistle after the AFD is resolved (I don't know if we're allowed to move articles once they begin AFD). 23skidoo 02:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
    • We can, as long as we point the AFD to the new title. Bearcat 18:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; valid article topic. Kudos to 23skidoo for the cleanup. Bearcat 18:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep rewritten article. Mindmatrix 19:48, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.