Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 23:27, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Phony

Transwikied dicdef Delete -Doc ^ask? 15:31, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Fraud --Allen 17:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, or redirect to lie or fraud. --Kinu 18:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• KeepI don’t see any reason to delete it. It gives valid information. At most there is a case for transferring it to Wiktionary.Barbara Shack 15:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, distinct concept featured prominently in a major work of literature. Kappa 15:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- Pierremenard 08:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.