Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip R. Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 00:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Phillip R. Johnson

Fails to meet WP:BIO, WP:V, and fails to prove its case for inclusion. Possible vanity. An56 05:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• Curator of the web's largest collection of sermons by Charles Spurgeon. Despite this Guinness-worthy distinction, I'll have to go with delete, vanity bio. --Calton | Talk 06:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, fails WP:BIO. Wikipedia is not the Guinness Book of World Records. --Coredesat talk 06:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. He is a prominent theological writer and editor. He is a close companion of John F. MacArthur, and Johnson is the director of the noteworthy ministry Grace to You. The inexperienced An56 nominated this article along with several other people mentioned as alumni for the Moody Bible Institute, as some form of cleanup to the articles pertaining to the institution. If anything, this article may need cleaned-up/expanded, not deleted. —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė ♫♪ 06:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Interesting person, but still I couldn't find anyone who found him interesting enough to write about him. Please, people, if you think someone is notable establish it. "I've heard about this guy before" is not a criterion for notability. ~ trialsanderrors 07:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: A "prominent theological writer and editor?" Mind sourcing that for us? This guy isn't even the front man for the ministry of which he is purportedly the director. A directed Google search [1] turns up only 99 unique hits, the lead few of which is his own website, this Wikipedia article and Wikimirrors, and various religious forums and blogs; I've got more unique G-hits than that. RGTraynor 09:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as non-notable bio +/- vanity. Ifnord 19:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Personally, I'd like to see this article rewritten and properly sourced. But in it's current state I'm angling for a delete. Black-Velvet 18:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.