Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippa baryan

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Philippa baryan

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Cyberjunkie | Talk 05:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

For a famous child prodigy, she sure doesn't have any Google whatsoever. Neither does her father. Aussies/Kiwis, is this for real? - Lucky 6.9 06:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

• Of course not: pure Vanity. should be speedied--Porturology 06:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• reading the discussion page this has to be a joke. i think its quite good and deserves a place in BJADON--Porturology 06:31, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

I doubt it. Get rid of it. The same user has made Amber Baryan, which smacks of nonsense also. Dysprosia 06:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, even if true, nn. I speedy deleted the article on her mother because it failed to allege notability (note that her mother's article didn't even mention these supposed books). Let's not fill in all of those red links, please? Zoe 06:06, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep--Figgleeeeeo 06:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
  • The above is the article's author, who also claims to be the mother of the subject. Zoe 06:13, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Delete That information would be better on their userpage.--inks 06:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

See also Tara Undercliff and Dance under the pretty trees. Zoe 06:29, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

• delete non-verifiable, and, probably, non-factual. Trollderella 07:21, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable/vanity. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:00, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
  • Also delete all related articles, Tara Undercliff is a pseudonym and should be included in the soon to be deleted page on the author in the first place. And Dance under the pretty trees is a self-published book no one knows about. Last statement in article is pure advertising. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:02, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and the related stuff, per Mgm. --GraemeL ^(talk) 10:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm an Australian and I've never heard of her or her Dad. A Google search on her came up empty handed. I can assure you that if a four year old child prodigy daughter of a TV celebrity had written her first book, there would be rather more interest than shown in this search [1].

Capitalistroadster 15:57, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Almost certainly a hoax. Dottore So 18:59, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. *drew 23:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete--Cyberjunkie | Talk 05:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.