Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pg. 99
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. I'll tag it for expansion, though! -Splash 20:37, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pg. 99
Not notable. brenneman(t)(c) 06:22, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep despite the incredibly bare article they do have an allmusic page which has a bio and lists 4 releases for the band. There are lots of reviews on google for their latest album, which was selected as an album pick by allmusic, but I'm not sure if they meet WP:MUSIC yet. Anyway, this isn't just another standard band vanity page so I'm more inclined to vote a keep, with a rewrite though. --TM (talk) 08:29, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I think that's a pretty good indication that they do meet WP:MUSIC. It needs more work, though. Punkmorten 20:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand as per WP:Music. Capitalistroadster 00:45, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
