Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pets Reunited Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 03:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pets Reunited Online

Bio of a gaming clan with 18 Google results. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as a non-notable group. Fabricationary 00:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Fabricationary. Fails WP:NN. --Tuspm ^{(C | @)} 01:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. NN (fails WP:WEB). It's a little bit of WP:VSCA. TrackerTV 01:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable group. WP:BIO and also WP:ORG alphaChimp ^laudare 01:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NN Kalani ^[talk] 01:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:WEB, no WP:RS to indicate notability. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Michael 07:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete gaming clans with no notability presented. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. No notability at all, fails WP:WEB and the Pokemon test. ><Richard0612 ^{UW 13:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)}
• Strong Delete Fails WP:NN and WP:WEB. Thε Halo ^Θ 16:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Reinstate the article when it becomes more notable (i.e. when it has perhaps a better-than-10,000 or 5,000 ranking on Alexa.com, or when it becomes known by enough people. How many people is enough, I couldn't say.) --Shultz IV 02:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete. It's just a gaming clan, which is a non-notable organization. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 09:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, only a very few gaming clans warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia, and this simply doesn't appear to be one of them. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 09:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Probably vanity. Ace of Sevens 12:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per above. --Stellmach 13:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above --Peephole 15:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)--

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.