Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Hirst
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 05:02, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Peter Hirst
This does not satisfy the criterion for notability; his primary distinction is as an unsuccessful candidate Matthew Platts 17:00, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a directory of PPCs. Timrollpickering 17:18, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete NN. David | Talk 09:46, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete' Not notable. ≈ jossi ≈ 04:09, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep--major party nominee for national legislature. Inherently notable. Meelar (talk) 14:45, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Meelar. Kappa 17:26, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete 3rd place cannon fodder. --TimPope 17:45, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Dottore So 19:15, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Being a nominee isn't notable. Winning the election is. --Carnildo 21:27, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete just about every libdem candidate lost, as did all but 640ish other candidates. It's dead easy. -Splash 21:37, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Seems legit. Trollderella 01:21, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non notable PPC. Secretlondon 04:52, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete failed candidates unless something else makes them notable. — Trilobite (Talk) 14:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, like many other PPCs. -R. fiend 14:54, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nonnotable politicians. Grue 19:34, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
