Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Chao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 23:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Chao

the page contains information that is untrue. Christianlove 15:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep — the nominator's reason for deletion is a ground for improving the article, not deleting it. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for non-notability, as opposed to uncited (and untrue) information QmunkE 16:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, his book nets nothing on Google ("Peter chao" "god does not play dice") (the latter is unsearchable being an Albert Einstein quote). --Obli (Talk)^? 16:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for non notability Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 16:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nomination reason is invalid, but nn delete per Obli. Kuru ^talk 16:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn-bio. --Terence Ong 17:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn-bio. Bucketsofg 18:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• delete per qmunke Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 19:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Improper nomination, but non-notable biography. — Adrian Lamo ·· 20:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree with Mel about the nominator's reason, but still find that the topic is non-notable. AnnH ♫ 21:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Winfield Reformed Church. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn --Khoikhoi 02:11, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.