Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penis-showing game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. For the record, I was the one who originally speedied it. If it is still found worthy of inclusion it can be undeleted again. — JIP | Talk 17:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Penis-showing game

This was speedied but restored by VfU, with a mandate that it be immediately listed here. So here it is. -Splash^talk 16:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, or maybe smerge with the film. Is there any evidence of this being played or even discussed outside of the film? -R. fiend 17:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, there is no proof that the game exists outside the film and even if it did, it would be played by so few people that it would be non-notable. Also such detailed information on this scene doesn't seem appropriate to merge with the film's article. -- Kjkolb 17:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Waiting (film) --MacRusgail 20:04, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Isn't it awfully nice to have a penis? the wub "?!" 23:03, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Undelete I created this article after seeing the movie and talking to friends who had played it before the movie had come out. Since originally deleted I have put more research into the phenomenon and as long as the page survives I promise to keep improving it. The game was originally created in the military (which is extremely interesting considering the "don't as, don't tell" policy.) I agree that most pop-culture is unencyclopaedic, but when it becomes a widely recognized part of culture the threshold of notability is crossed. This game has many particpants and even more who know of it, but don't play. A simple google search will reveal as much. I know it is crude/nonsense/offensive, but none of these take away from the fact that it should be considered knowledge. Instead of thinking that something shouldn't be in an encyclopedia because you don't know it, think that it should be in so people like you can learn about it. The benefit to Wiki is that anyone can contribute and it is fluidly updated every second. This could take years to make it into print, but in the mean time people will get their information from here. This is not vandalism, it is education and free speech. MacAllah 23:39, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per kjKolb. Dottore So 06:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of verifiability other than as a device in a specific film. MCB 07:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:V. encephalon 18:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.