Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pendelfin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - notability established, but this page needs some serious work. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pendelfin

Spammy, doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP. MER-C 07:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and expand. This isn't like most corp's we see listed: it's been around for 60 years. Tons of google hits: ^{[Check Google hits]}. Probably has had a history of publications on itself. (|-- UlTiMuS 08:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Badly written spam. Pendle Hill surrounds Burnley - rubbish. -- RHaworth 09:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• The article by Proudlove and the book by Ashbrook satisfy the WP:CORP criteria. Fixing the word "surrounds" is a matter of simple editing. Keep. Uncle G 11:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Seems like notability is well established; we just need a better article. --Brianyoumans 04:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but needs a rewrite badly. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Withdrawing nomination - I am satisfied that this article meets our notifiability guidelines and is fit to stay. MER-C 10:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.