The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Ad for a not-for-profit; no evidence of encyclopedic value. --Peta 05:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. May even be a speedy. MER-C 07:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete as per nom. DesertSky85451 19:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.