Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul William Hunter

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 06:47, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Paul William Hunter

O, how I wish we could speedy patent vanity like this. --Xcali 02:33, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Me too. Please delete. -- Hadal 02:37, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)\
• Me three. The VfD load will soon be far too high. Delete. --Barfooz (talk) 02:47, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I see no harm, keep it on. -- Posted by 142.150.163.80 (talk • contribs), while simultaneously removing all other votes
• I see no benefit. Delete. Geogre 03:41, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Personal ego stroking. Delete. Vonspringer 03:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Does not assert notability. resume, vanity. Wikibofh 04:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 05:28, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I'm very sorry if I've caused any trouble, I'm new to Wikipedia and I was testing out the area. I am interested though in updating the UTSC page, I'm an alumnus with many years experience in UTSC history, culture, and achievements. I do sincerely apologize for any commotion I may have caused. -- Posted by 142.150.163.80 (talk • contribs)
• Delete. WP:BIO. DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:33, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. You 19:24, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.