Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul M. Spicer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul M. Spicer

No assertion of notability, except that he's got a job with some little known peridicals Dontdoit 01:46, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for now. If the periodicals become bigger then I'd consider him notable enough.
• Delete. This article is the very definition of nn. In addition, Wikipedia is not a resume-posting service. --Aaron 03:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete some guy's resume. Don't forget to take him out of List of non-fiction writers and List of magazine writers. Opabinia regalis 04:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above.UberCryxic 04:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 04:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Clear attempt at self-promotion. His books have no significant awards or sales ranking in bookstores. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As above. +Fin- 13:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.