Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Luzio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 04:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul_Luzio

Doesn't seem particularly notable, and there isn't much information in this article on why he is notable. Mr. Vernon 01:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Based on what's here, he seems to fail the professor test, and he is, in fact, a professor. Fan1967 02:10, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. He is a professor, just follow the link. Seems to have published around 170 articles, many with resonable to high citation numbers. Page needs serious reworking however, this reads like advertisment. --KimvdLinde 03:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment What I find at his own list of major publications [[1]] is about twenty papers, all of which are co-authored with 3-6 others. Doesn't really seem to establish him as notable Fan1967 04:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Yup, of the past 2.5 years, what about earlier work? --KimvdLinde 04:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment What you're saying is that if you devote enough energy to searching, you can find something notable about him. Fact remains that the article does not indicate any notability. Fan1967 04:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Nah, non-notable is not only determined based on the page itself. and as I said, it needs reworking. --KimvdLinde 05:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete self promotional autobiography. --Mmeinhart 04:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• . At the moment it might be speedied as an attempt to contact someone. It even has his e-mail. It leads me to think it might be a copyvio of his Cambridge page but it doesn't seem so. He holds an important position and has a number of important papers to his credit and keep and cleanup.Capitalistroadster 04:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Not a perfect article, but the man directs the Cambridge Institute for Medical Research. That makes him far more notable than the average professor. -ikkyu2 (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite. --Terence Ong 09:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Ikkyu2 but tag it with all sorts of clean-up messages MLA 14:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Ikkyu2. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Ikkyu2. And the standard "professor test" is pretty silly; I'd love to nominate an article with the explanation "no more notable than the average King of France" and watch what happens. Monicasdude 15:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Lots of the deletion criteria are silly to ridiculous. I don't think AfD is the place to debate that, though. -ikkyu2 (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Director at Cambridge is pretty notable. Would he be listed in Who's Who? Avi 21:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unremarkable.[2] -- Krash (Talk) 15:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Avi. Metamagician3000 06:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.