Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party Foul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Party Foul

Neologism; Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. Deprodded. Accurizer 11:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, its not even a good definition of a slang word, I stll don't know what it means. Also unsourced so unverifiable. Gwernol 12:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Coredesat 12:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Deletion most foul bad pun. But I'm tired and that's all that's on my mind. --SeizureDog 12:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This isn't even a widely-used term. Ace of Sevens 13:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Fuhghettaboutit 14:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Cute bit of slang, or maybe just an in-group pharse. But that's not enough for Wikipedia. Interlingua 20:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 01:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. Besides, I've never heard it used, and if it's used in my area, I definitely would have heard it. Grandmasterka 19:44, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.