Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkhoppers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 05:52, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Parkhoppers
Fans of the fanclub of a fanfilm of a film. We're about four degrees from notability here. DS 16:11, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this fairly obvious Vanity article.--Isotope23 18:50, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- I tagged for speedy since there's no claim to notability. --TM (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. probably not quite a speedy, so I'll remove the speedy tag. Regular deletion should suffice. -R. fiend 19:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- I think you could go speedy under CSD/A7... there isn't anything in the article that even approaches a claim of notability.--Isotope23 19:32, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- I was going to say that A7 generally applies to people, and this is a film. However, upon closer inspection, it isn't really about the film, if the film even exists. If you can find an admin to delete I sure as hell won't be bringing it to VfU. I'm hesitant to do it myself, though. I've only been an admin a few days, and don't feel like rocking the boat at the moment. I won't remove the speedy tag again, if anyone cares to reinsert it. -R. fiend 21:48, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- You have a good point. 5 days or right now, looks like the outcome will be the same either way, so it's fine the way it is.--Isotope23 17:48, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- I was going to say that A7 generally applies to people, and this is a film. However, upon closer inspection, it isn't really about the film, if the film even exists. If you can find an admin to delete I sure as hell won't be bringing it to VfU. I'm hesitant to do it myself, though. I've only been an admin a few days, and don't feel like rocking the boat at the moment. I won't remove the speedy tag again, if anyone cares to reinsert it. -R. fiend 21:48, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- I think you could go speedy under CSD/A7... there isn't anything in the article that even approaches a claim of notability.--Isotope23 19:32, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly a self-promotion article. Solarusdude 19:27, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
