Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Louise Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was DELETE. nn-author Madchester 22:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pamela Louise Lee

See Google matches[1] - 28. Two books on Amazon do not automatically make a notable author. Majority of info in this article can not be verified in any other source except for the author's own "MySpace". Mad Jack 01:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nod Mad Jack 01:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete The article is in need of serious revision and needs more focus on Lee as opposed to the lives of each of her family members. Michael 01:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, per WP:BIO and per WP:VAIN. The whole content is utterly unverifiable as no independent source seems to have any interest. May I add that two books on Amazon, are published by iUniverse which is a vanity press. Pascal.Tesson 02:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete self-published best seller with Amazon.com Sales Rank: None Dlyons493 Talk 02:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Another vanity press author. The books are completely non-notable (not in Library of Congress, no reviews outside of Amazon, etc). I hope that eventually she gets the fame she wants, but she isn't there now. Ted^Talk/_{Contributions} 03:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above; non-notable author fails WP:BIO. HumbleGod 03:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom - fails WP:BIO -- Alias Flood 03:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment people involved in this discussion might be interested in contributing to the current discussion on notability criteria for books. The proposal was motivated by a debate on another book published by iUniverse which I think can also shed light on the current debate. Pascal.Tesson 03:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete somewhat notable and vanity. --GoOdCoNtEnT 03:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete - probably fails WP:BIO, but definitely fails WP:VER. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 04:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO, unranked on Amazon, books published by a vanity press. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --GentlemanGhost 09:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete these are self-published by iUniverse (print on demand). Vanity press stuff. Just zis Guy you know? 10:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, failing WP:BIO guidelines. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Mason 21:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity. dcandeto 22:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.