Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PWE (E-Fed)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Grandmasterka 08:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PWE (E-Fed)

None notable e-fed, (a site where write roleplays and people pretend to be wrestlers) Englishrose 06:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete fails WP:BIO and is completely unencyclopedic hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 07:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:NN vanity Alphachimp ^talk 07:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep. Its helpful and relevant to fans of E-Wrestling, a growing community on the internet. As the biggest E-Fed, it serves as an example to other [User:KlintKastaway]

• Deletion of this article has no merit. It is not hurting any one for it's presence on the site. It is not producing falsified information in any way. It is an E-Federation site where people with english talent are able to re-produce that talent in the form of characters from their own minds. It is an art form, though many will not see it that way and that's fine. It is the perfect example to have on wikipedia for an example e-federation for those interested in the area. It has over 1000 members and growing and has seen a life span of over 3 years. There is simply not a good enough reason to delete it. Notability? What defines that anyways? Over 1000 people have visited and signed up to the website and if you look at the edit history, there is interest in this wiki and it will CONTINUE to be updated since the federation CONTINUES to live on and expand. The information and history will continue to be written. Is it so bad and so wrong to have a prime example of a successful and fun e-fed as an example wiki and as an extension of the E-Fed wiki? I don't think so. Please keep this article. It is a great addition to wikipedia and the fact that a couple persons do not enjoy or understand e-federations is not reason enough for it's termination. Thank you, and again, KEEP this article. --Shmylann13 14:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, non-notable, and non-verifiable. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 13:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• It is verifiable. Go to site and the PWE Inc Archives section and all the information provided on this wiki can be verified.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shmylann13 (talk • contribs) 09:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:WEB (hosted at Invision?!). --Kinu ^t/_c 17:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep. Cause Stone Cold said so. Also because it shows an extensive history of the federation and serves as an example for others. The IWC takes interest in this hobby and there's no strong reason for its deletion. --CaptainLice 19:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC):::*Note. User's first edit Englishrose 19:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable. JChap (Talk) 22:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete-NN and fails WP:WEB. --Wine Guy Talk 23:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

KEEP: There is a large group of people who take interest in this hobby, and this federation has been around for a long enough time to make it notable to those in the Internet Wrestling Community. Everything on this Wiki can be verified. People who see Professional Wrestling for the art form it is, should see this for what it is: an art form.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Revorg Restam (talk • contribs) 22:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC):::*Note. User's first edit

• Delete per nom non-noteable. Davidpdx 00:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No individual e-fed deserves it's own page here. TJ Spyke 04:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.