Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxenfez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 05:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oxenfez

Neologism. Original research. Article has no verifiable content. It survived VfD in October 2004, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxenfez (old). Vote was: one delete, one unexplained "keep," and one "keep" on the grounds that "regardless of its name, other users have reported having heard of this game, albeit perhaps in a different form." However, Wikipedia users do not qualify as verifiable sources. No improvements in article since October 2004; no edits at all other than vandalism ("Goose is gay" and "Goose is twelve") and categorization. No response to my request for citations a week ago. Hundreds of Google hits, but all apparently copies of the Wikipedia article. Are we serious about verifiability? If so, this article should go. An article on Oxenfez with verifiable source citations can, of course, be re-created at any time without prejudice. Dpbsmith (talk) 14:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. If this is kept I'm recreating Irish chess, it had exactly the same amount of verification (a Wikipedian had heard of it too). (I am joking, of course, two wrongs don't make a right.) --Malthusian (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per Nom. Even with 15 months of Wiki support it doesn't seem to have joined monopoly in game fame.Obina 15:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 16:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 19:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Latinus 20:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 20:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unverified. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 00:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.