Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overlord Smurf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (no consensus to BJAODN, but someone could do it if they wanted to, I'm not at all opposed to the idea). - ulayiti (talk) 01:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Overlord Smurf

Tagged as nonsense speedy - and it isn't. But given it was created by User:Overlord Smurf I'm not exactly optimistic (no vote) --Doc (?) 00:48, 2 November 2005 (UTC) -Doc (?) 00:48, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. A quick Google search shows that the material here has no external reality. Melchoir 00:53, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm thinking some kind of fanfiction and possible vanity. Either way, it's a hell of a lot of effort. Saberwyn 00:56, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN I'm not sure whether this is supposed to a serious proposal for a TV series, or a wikipedian on a really bad acid trip? Unreadable utter rubbish - but also obviously a work of time-consuming love. One could speedy this, or frame it. --Doc (?) 01:15, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not particularly amusing. Gazpacho 01:26, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't exist outside of wikipedia and the writer's head and forum handles. —BrianSmithson 01:55, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a free Web space provider. Flowerparty■ 02:09, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete isolated article by one-article user of same name; vanity fiction jnothman ^talk 02:40, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Wow. Just... Wow. Preserve as an incredibly detailed and lengthy BJAODN. At 86 KB, it might need its own page... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:41, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. Tupsharru 07:59, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Too long for BJAODN IMO. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 11:54, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete unverifiable (amusing tho). - Just zis Guy, you know? 13:29, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN, this nonsense content should be saved somewhere. -Andrew 17:03, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Smurfcruft, BJAODN. JFW | T@lk 17:21, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN; give it its own page. --Optichan 21:18, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; does this exist as actual fanfic, or is it just nonsense? In either case, it's gotta go. MCB 00:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Given the amount of work that went into this, perhaps we should Userfy? If not, Delete both it and all related image files. -Colin Kimbrell 15:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Brilliant! I was laughing out loud. But Delete. We definitely need to preserve this somewhere else though. flowersofnight (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Move to its own special place in BJAODN. BD2412 T 04:30, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.. there is an overbearing website by that name but this an article of fiction.Dakota ? e 06:12, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.