Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onfireministries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 05:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Onfireministries

Non-notable. Does not meet WP:V -Nv8200p talk

• Delete, fails WP:ORG, lack of WP:RS to pass WP:V. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Google hits are misleadingly high at about 1200 The article says they are in Bangalore. There is a similarly named evangelical organization in the US with a different webpage. :) Dlohcierekim 20:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Okay, let's delete this properly. Uh... first this is speedy deleted as A7, then it's speedy deleted because of basically having an A7 substub, then it's speedy deleted by me because the author blanked the article (do they want the article or not?) Now, it's grown into an article that basically doesn't give any bigger hints on possible notability of the subject. Website is absolutely of no help in this respect, either. Not notable, hard to verify. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Give us one good reason as to why should you delete this. We are really confident that Rencin and others are really sad about this[[1]]. Yes it is true that there is also another organization in that name, but does that mean to say that you will have to delete it just because it is from India.
  Praying for you all. God bless you. If you are deleting it then do it soon. Please don't delay and make us feel sad because of this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.173.93.41 (talk • contribs).
  • For your information, we're keeping this deletion debate open 5 days after it was opened, and after that, as long as it takes for an admin to come to conclusion. We're keeping this open as long as it needs to, to give everyone a fair shot to fix the problem. The reason why this article is considered for deletion is stated above in this weird Wikipedia lingo, and in normal Earth communications, it'd be best summed as thus: a) the organisation appears to be rather small and has little influence beyond the immediate surroundings (yes, we cover local organisations too, but we also need to consider "how local is too local"?) and b) there doesn't appear to be any reliable media sources in the article that would talk about the organisation. The organisation's own website helps, but we'd really really love to see news mentions and like. Sorry if any of you are feeling bad about this, but we regrettably have a rather high bar for inclusion. I'm not included, either. My city is here, as is my university, but, uh, that's about it =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.