Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omygodimonfire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Omygodimonfire

Non-notable, even on the fringe basis of flashcruft or meme. Nothing that couldn't be added to the parent article Decline of Video Gaming should it survive its own AfD. Put this one out. Papacha 08:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. 169.231.23.121 09:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Tychocat 09:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. If anything justifies an expansion in the criteria for speedy deletion... it's stuff like this. - Motor (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Obscure fancruft Ydam 12:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fan of the series and I've never heard the line quoted. And I have over 10,000 posts on Newgrounds, I would freaking know if it's used. Now if it was "Isonfire", then I'd say keep, but that's an entirely different fad. --SeizureDog 12:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fancruft. --Coredesat 12:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Ohmygoddelete as unencyclopedic fancruft. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. At the most, this could be a one-sentence entry in an article on Internet slang. It's not an article in itself. Interlingua 19:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom skorpion 00:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 01:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "...even been used as a username for the World of Warcraft forums" = gold. _dk 08:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.