Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omigod
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Luigi30 (Ταλκ το mε) 22:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Omigod
Seemingly unverifiable, as I can find no sources for it, and think that it's unlikely that there are any. Bringing it to AfD to see if anyone else can find some. Ziggurat 21:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete this
complete bollocksnow not bollocks, a dictdef instead. Just zis Guy you know? 22:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC) - Delete: per WP:NFT and WP:NEO. --Hetar 23:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Just zis Guy you know? Jesuschex 03:25, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 11:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep This isn't normally how we deal with this sort of thing. The article needs a cleanup at best. How much research did you really do? Google returns 796 thousand instances of the term. There's also a definition in dictionary.com See Here Factoid Killer 18:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment You've completely rewritten the article - nothing of the original remains except the title. I did my research, and could find no sources for "a word used in an offensive context to describe a group of people who consistently use the phrase 'Oh my god' as a means of expressing exclamation or excitement." The old article was obvious unsourced OR; this new article looks like a dicdef to me, so my delete assessment still stands. Ziggurat 19:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The state of the original article was grounds for a rewrite not a deletion. dicdef is grounds to move to wictionary not to delete the article altogether. But, an article can and should always begin with a good definition or a clear description of the topic. If you're interested in working on a wiki dictionary, check out the Wiktionary project! i believe this article, which is already referenced, could be expanded. It is a popular term and the article could reflect its popular use and rise to fame. Factoid Killer 21:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment You've completely rewritten the article - nothing of the original remains except the title. I did my research, and could find no sources for "a word used in an offensive context to describe a group of people who consistently use the phrase 'Oh my god' as a means of expressing exclamation or excitement." The old article was obvious unsourced OR; this new article looks like a dicdef to me, so my delete assessment still stands. Ziggurat 19:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- keep please it is more than a definition and 684000 google htis Yuckfoo 20:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Transwiki anyone, per JzG? -- ReyBrujo 20:34, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment as a precedent take a look at Teenybopper and Teenybopper music —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Factoid Killer (talk • contribs) .
- Delete as alternative spelling of 'Oh, my God'. — CRAZY`(IN)`SANE 22:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
