Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nterface

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nterface

Advertising, nn software, article created by User:Nterfacejason. I PRODded, but Nterfacejason removed the PROD, so I bring it here. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete — vainity. SynergeticMaggot 00:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - the advertising for the company was slapped onto an existing article. I've removed the addition of the company spam. -- Whpq 01:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • There's nothing in the article which explains its notability. How many users does it have? Has it been cited in major publications? User:Zoe|(talk) 01:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Technology is no more notable than the company. User:Nterfacejason.
• Delete per nom. Wryspy 04:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity, and advertisement is strongly prohibited in Wikipedia by Wikipedia policies. Daniel's page ☎ 06:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not assertation of notability
• Delete non-notable Dlyons493 Talk 11:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't stand as notable in itself. Probably warrants some additional explanation in the QuakeNet article. StuffOfInterest 13:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no reliable sources WilyD 13:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete impossible to verify and too small in scope. (|-- UlTiMuS ^{( U • T • C | M • E )} 20:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.