Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notd aftermath (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and protect from recreation. Nufy8 00:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notd aftermath

This is what happens when you don't watch your deleted pages. This was previously deleted in one of my most emphatic nominations at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notd aftermath. The reasons why this page was recreated is given at Talk:Notd aftermath, but in addition to the article, this is a multiple nomination. The further articles are nominated:

• List of NOTD Aftermath items
• NOTD Aftermath history
• NOTD Aftermath weapons
• NOTD Aftermath Zulus

NOTD is not a notable mod. A google search for "NOTD Aftermath" gives 100 unique links. The only assertion of notability is that it made the "spotlight map" on http://battle.net , note that spotlight maps occur once a week. - Hahnchen 00:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Peta 00:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Arbusto 01:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all, again. Opabinia regalis 01:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and salt per nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Resolute 02:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Hello32020 03:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all and protect from recreation per nom.--Húsönd 03:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. MER-C 04:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per all above; protect as appropriate. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Frag --Kitch ^{(Talk | Contrib)} 12:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom -Markeer 12:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete All per nom. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 14:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and protect the main article (G4 - recreation of deleted material). Ask the re-creator to take his beef to deletion review. Delete the rest of the NN fancruft. -- Plutortalkcontribs 15:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per all above.UberCryxic 19:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Milton Humason 03:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above; non-notable. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 01:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.