Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonebrity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Ral315 (talk) 04:40, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Nonebrity
NN dictdef, D. ComCat 00:35, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete/send to Wiktionary. Clearly just a dictionary definition, with no hope of becoming a true article. -Willmcw 00:48, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, neologism. I don't think Wiktionary would be very happy with us if we dumped it on their doorstep, but you never know. ComCat, I'm pleased that you've expended the effort to write an extra word in your nomination, by the way. Keep it up, mate! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 02:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. This does not belong in Wikipedia as it is a neologism not currently capable of much expansion. However, Wiktionary may be interested in it as it has been cited in the Guardian see [1]. On the other hand, they may not as it only gets 58 Google results see [2] including a reference on pseudodictionary. In short, transwiki to Wiktionary if they are interested, delete if they are not. Capitalistroadster 03:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete dicdef (as a neologism I don't think it has wide enough curreency to transwiki, but I could be wrong). Full marks to the writer for coininig such a useful word, though. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 09:57, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Google gives 78, which is still a neologism to my mind. Alternatively, mergeep, redete or possibly tranpand. Marskell 10:59, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. NN K.
- Delete as neologism. Ifnord 18:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as neologism and dic def.Gateman1997 23:25, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
