Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil joshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nikhil joshi

Unwikified vanity; context shows the artist might be of note but the majority of this article is unsalvageable. Erath 09:59, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity, unwikified, copyvio (lightly edited PR blurb straight from Joshi's website--just because you change some wording doesn't mean it's not plagiarism). rodii
• Delete It seems like the contributions from the author 59.92.134.224 are only for this article. Can't confirm vanity but definitely NN according to Google anyway. HackJandy 22:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

I do not know who is Nikhil joshi. But this is not the only article in wikipedia to have such text and tenor. Why single out this article. Some articles for administrators themselves look no different. But may be wikipedia has a silent ownership and there are more equals among equals. When individuals are profiled, there will be some contents to manifest like vanity - but outlooks are mostly subjective. Modify, moderate, do anything but don't kill information. sum

I didn't "single out" this article because of its content. I would nominate any similar article for deletion. The article is a vanity page for a non-notable person and a copy-violation from his own website, according to the votes above, which are fairly unanimous. I appreciate your concerns but I feel consensus will show this kind of article is not welcome at Wikipedia. Erath 17:04, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.