Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Tappenden (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was it was already deleted by User:Teke. — CharlotteWebb 17:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nicola Tappenden
Has been nominated twice before (first and second). She hasn't become notable since, and the page keeps getting recreated. Can we protect it from recreation (but still have a way for it to be easily unlocked in the event that she does become notable)? We need to put a flag on the talk page after it is deleted so that future editors know that it has been deleted three times already (at that point). EVula 17:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, as per not notable Hello32020 17:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per G4. She's not notable, and this was voted as delete and speedy delete in two previous AfD's. --Nishkid64 18:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, the article was speedily deleted, but nothing was done to make sure it isn't recreated. All that is going to happen is it will be recreated. I'm adding the correct tags to the talk page. I'd like to point out that this is why I didn't prod the article for speedy deletion; it required just a bit more attention. EVula 21:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.