Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick pearson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi.sg 08:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nick pearson
Looks like a vanity article (created by User:Nick Pearson) Anons have been edit warring over this page as vanity or not. It has been deprodded at least once. This particular Nick Pearson appears to be completely overshadowed by an actor and also an olympic athelete, each of the same name. While it lasts, I encorage you to read his blog entry where he states such lovely things as:
"So my plea to you. Join Wikipedia, as it takes only a few moments, and post a comment on the discussion pages about how this page should stay on the website, not because it isn't self-serving or shamelessly promoting a radio show that no-one outside of Bathurst and Orange can listen to, but because people deserve to know as to the absolutely marvellous nature that is me."
I think the author well justifies that the page is vanity and that they themselves have self-justified themselves as not meeting WP:BIO. --Kevin_b_er 05:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a ballot, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using
|
- Speedy delete As non-notable biography. Werdna talk criticism 06:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per nom. NN person and he even admitted it's a vanity page. TJ Spyke 06:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as per nom, Don't leave it around for his blog-minions to flood the page. Canadian-Bacon (contribs) 06:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --Graham 07:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per A7. Leuko 08:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.