Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Long (Cult)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete all as CSD G1. "Nick Long saw action as a foot soldier in the Roman legion during the First Roman-Jewish War. It is believed that during this time he was set upon by Catholics opposed to the Army" - that would be implausible, because there weren't any Catholics back then. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Long (Cult)

Also mominated:

• Chronicles of Long
• Nick Long (redirect)

AFDs merged (by Netsnipe)

• Delete seems to be a hoax or a wind-up Charlesknight 11:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Provided link is invalid. In fact, there doesn't even appear to be a WHOIS record for nws.edu.au. Fails: Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Hoaxes --  Netsnipe  ^(Talk)  11:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Likely hoax; Nick Long is another related article that's also up for deletion. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: If someone nominated an article for deletion, and the template has this date on it, shouldn't there be a space for debate here? Where else might it be? Is the deletion debatable? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.252.192.56 (talk • contribs) .
• Speedy delete total nonsense or close to it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• It was a contested prod, hence the AFD. --  Netsnipe  ^(Talk)  12:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.