Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewsMax Media
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep. SynergeticMaggot 05:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NewsMax Media
Completing incomplete nom by anon. No vote. Morgan Wick 05:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep seems to have been published about in independent media. -- Koffieyahoo 05:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain Wile E. Heresiarch 17:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC) - Keep, NewsMax is pretty well-known on various userboards where politics are discussed, notably Fark.com. 775 unique Ghits (not too shabby), and Alexa ranking is 2,294 (not bad at all). I think these guys are nutty, personally, but it does strike me as notable. Of course, a cleanup couldn't hurt, really. -- H·G (words/works) 06:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Terrible but notable. -- GWO
- Keep and cleanup, notability established but written poorly. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 10:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Notable wingnut news source Bwithh 12:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per Bwithh. -- Whpq 13:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep one of the most scurrilous, unreliable, despicable "companies" ever to blight the earth. This thing is often cited by scholarly individuals like Bill O'Reilly. However, note that this is an article about the company, and not the service. We should not allow articles on both, as the company is virtually unknown, while the service is well attested. Geogre 14:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, that's wild. Keep, move, and clean up... anything that controversial needs a crazy "criticism" section that lists well-cited inaccuracies made by the "news source"... -Aknorals 12:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, notable conservative online publication, though the article should be moved to either NewsMax or NewsMax.com. I also have a feeling that this AfD may be politically inspired. --TheFarix (Talk) 17:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and clean up, notable conservative news source. I may not agree with what it reports, but it fits the guidelines. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 17:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and clean up per TheFarix. Jacqui★ 20:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep no reason to delete. Seems notable. C56C 02:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
