Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Year's Eve party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep. Plenty of consensus for keep, even the nominator does not appear to have wanted this deleted. Discussion of merge with New Year's Eve is better done on talk pages, not Afd. Any such discussion is not precluded due to this Afd. Friday (talk) 18:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] New Year's Eve party
Someone deleted this article without an explanation as to why. I vote that the article should be kept, it's a well written article. What do you think?CarDepot 22:49, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think it was ever deleted. It should not have been brought to AfD. Editing disputes, e.g. whether an article should be a redirect or not, should be discussed on the article's Talk page, Talk:New Year's Eve party in this case. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:50, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- keep. Kappa 03:04, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. Notable topic and article should explain the traditions. Capitalistroadster 03:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep more notable than elementary schools --JAranda | watz sup 03:50, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand Well, if we're going to talk that way, JAranda, then it's more notable than Wikipedia Day. Jacqui ★ 03:55, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per Kappa. Garr 04:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. —Brim 04:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- It wasn't deleted, it was converted to a redirect to New Year's Eve, which is how it should stay, in my opinion. The article as it stands really says no more than "this is a party on New Year's Eve" and goes on to define what New Year's Eve is. Leave as redirect and merge anything remotely useful into New Year's Eve. Tonywalton | Talk 15:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.