Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Numa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge `'mikka (t) 00:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Numa

Viral marketing campaign by the Numa Numa guy. See WP:AN#Gary Brolsma wikipedia advertising campaign. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to Numa Numa. This latest venture merits little more than a footnote until it actually becomes a success on its own, if that happens. Aplomado ^talk 02:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Numa Numa, as per above.--TBCTaLk?!? 02:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Numa Numa, as per above. --ArmadilloFromHell 03:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Numa, numa iei... —Khoikhoi 05:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per above. Michael 08:00, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Merge the King of Numa......  :) FreddyFred 08:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge As above 27pence 09:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, obvious ad. Lankiveil 11:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC).
• Merge per above Computerjoe's talk 12:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Khoikhoi. - Kookykman|(t)e 13:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or Keep per nom, too early to tell. --Tony Narlock 17:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Where did I say anything about keeping? User:Zoe|(talk) 19:38, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The video has just been released; let's give it some time before we rush to conclusions. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
  • Do you not understand the meaning of notability? "Let's keep it to see if it becomes notable" is not how things work around here. We are documenting notability, not promoting it. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
    • There is no need to be so aggressive Zoe, please relax. This phenomenon is notable, and is already being covered by non-trivial sources such as The Mercury News. [1] RFerreira 07:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• deleteThey are just trying to market the song User:anonymous
• Merge and I'm not making any bets on its success. Danny Lilithborne 23:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Numa Numa. Sephylight 03:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Numa Numa, spam spam. (There is already a section in the main article.) Robert A.West (Talk) 05:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into the main Numa Numa. Crazysunshine 06:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Numa Numa. --Stlemur 07:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Numa Numa --Defragged 16:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Viral marketing crap. Not really worthy of merging, the mention in Numa Numa documents it well enough and this just reads like a press release. Shouldn't be tolerated on Wikipedia. istewart 07:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Numa Numa. On second thought, Gary Brolsma really should have his own article, but that is neither here nor there. RFerreira 07:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- I dont like having advertising on Wikipedia either. Nwwaew 11:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge, admavertisming, belongs with Numa Numa Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Awesome song. --ZFU738 15:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge. It is an internet phenomina, not advertising.--IsaacN 15:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no merge shameless promo. `'mikka (t) 19:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I have recreated Gary Brolsma. This covers the info from New Numa, which, I see has a disambig link on it to New Numa (song) just to complicate matters. (deleted as copyvio) Tyrenius 10:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Merge to "Numa Numa." it deserves mention, but not own article.

• Merge to Numa Numa Viral marketing at it's worst. Please, I urge this page be merged. User:WastBarktender100

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.