Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo space

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neo space

Neo space (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Looks like fancruft to me. Not even Google brings up a lot of information about this, the main Yu-Gi-Oh! article doesn't cover it, no reliable sources are given, and it seems basically like a non-notable extremely minor element of the anime. Crystallina 05:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. It's fancruft if true, but I don't even think it IS. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 05:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Stukkk 05:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 05:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - The card range now includes Neo Space Deletion! Ganbatte!!! Spawn Man 06:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, or redirect to Yu-Gi-Oh! if it can be confirmed as true to discourage recreation. VegaDark 06:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Delete per nom. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 08:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable fancruft. Spinach Dip 09:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Neo delete per above. MER-C 09:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This article with its content doesn't look to be suitable for wikipedia.--Soroush ^{☺talk | ☼Contributions} 11:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete-As per all. Nileena joseph ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 03:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Same as Amarkov. For me This article seems to be Fancruft. Daniel5127 (Talk) 04:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.