Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedin David (M.D.,Ph.D.)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. ugen64 03:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nedin David (M.D.,Ph.D.)

There are no results for this person and the article should be clearly deleted. However, the article seems to contain some scientific-sounding text (I don't have time to read it). Was wondering if anyone wanted this content moved anywhere. Oldak Quill 02:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO and possibly WP:VANITY. Half the article also seems to be an original research essay on biology (or something related to it). Only 3 Google results [1], one of which is from Wikipedia.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment scientific content appears to be a copyvio from here, although the site seems to be down at present. Ziggurat 04:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, essay, fails WP:BIO, contains copyvio. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity/promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, looking at the contributions of the user who created the page... he appears to have uploaded imags taken from astralsport.com. So I visted that site, and found that it is basically webforum... one of the stories there (front page second one down)... or here is a direct link... is a story titled: "Formation of the anaphylactic and delay types of hyper sensibility zones at limiting for the organism physical loadings in sports of high achievements.", followed by the comment "published on Wikipedia". I can't find any mention of Nedin David on google (note: this edit, shortly before the creation of this article, added him to List of immunologists -- a list meant for noted immunologists. Without more information, I have to dismiss this as original research and the subject of the article as non-notable... and given the style, quite possibly WP:VANITY, WP:AUTO too. - Motor (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Zos 20:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity/selling something. Seidenstud 22:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.