Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Damweber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan Damweber

OK, so his thesis got published in a journal. As a rule, one journal article does not equal encyclopedic notability. I think this is below the threshold. Since the article may well have been started by the person who is the subject of the article, and an earlier {{notability}} was anonymously removed, I figured this at least merits discussion here. Sound like an impressive young man, could well be notable in the future but: notability first, encyclopedia article later. - Jmabel | Talk 23:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• Leaning toward delete unless more notability can be shown. Perfectly OK with userfying it. - Jmabel | Talk 23:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:PROF by a long chalk and so WP:VAIN that I nominate it for inclusion in WP:BJAODN.... The painting of Mr. Damweber posing dramatically with Karl Marx made my day. I hope its the first of a series - does Nathan have paintings of himself doing a black power fist salute with Malcolm X or perhaps posed deep in thought with Noam Chomsky planned? Will the paintings get hung in his living room or do his students get to admire them in his classroom? Bwithh 03:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Bwithh. 1ne 07:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I'm with Bwithh on this one. WP:VAIN, but it made me laugh. Em-jay-es 08:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Bwithh. Definite BJAODN material, love the painting. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:10, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Someone may also wish to AfD Ross Global Academy, created a few weeks later by the same editor as Nathan Damweber ... which is apparently the only article linked to it. <Sigh!> --141.156.232.179 21:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems to have only this one paper. Espresso Addict 10:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Espresso Addict Nigel ^(Talk) 12:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.