Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanosphere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nanosphere

More vanity/original research by dacoutts (talk • contribs)/David Coutts (talk • contribs) — Dunc|☺ 12:09, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom Tom Harrison ^(talk) 14:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• delete or rename I may have seen the term used before in reference to future speculative events. But, I have just done a quick search and found a different description (of nanospheres as they are now rather than the far future)>> "Polymeric nanospheres can be simply defined as latex particles in nanoscale that are synthesized by polymerization or emulsification process. They have very uniform diameters in the range of 1 to 100 nm and extensive surface areas due to the small particle size in spite of their non-porosity. Although the technique to synthesis nanosphere has not long developing history, many works have been achieved in various fields." source: What is a nanosphere? - max rspct leave a message 15:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all the original research from Mr. Coutts; I was going to give him a few days to find a real source before nominating this series myself. Note that beyond the 5 articles nominated today, he wrote Differential replication and Exponentialist, both of which are now redirects to Darwinism and Exponentialism, respectively. I have no problem with a rewrite on latex nanobeads. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 15:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• delete OR vanity about communicty of hypothetical futuristic lifeforms. Pete.Hurd 17:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Nanosphere seems to be most well known as the name of a technology company per google [1]. So unless someone wants to rewrite the whole article to be about that, then delete it. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 17:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:NOR. Stifle 02:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.