Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanophilia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was del . mikka (t) 03:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nanophilia

Was listed for speedy deletion but may not be a speedy candidate. The topic is a Requested article, and although the article in its current state is little more than an unverified dicdef, I suspect someone here will be able to make an encyclopedia-worthy stub (at least) for this topic by the time this AFD is through. No vote from me. Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 11:45, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to -philia. Pburka 16:27, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
• delete, no redirect. Dicdef at best. Nonnotable, nonverifiable. mikka (t) 18:36, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect. This is not mentioned in paraphilia. I don't think anything more than a definition is ever going to come of this. Dave 19:13, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep — a google search seems to indicate that this is the standard, accepted term for this sexual preference. It should be added to paraphilia. I wouldn't think that even so much as a dicdef could come from robot fetishism, but if we have an article on that then surely we can and should have an article on this. --DavidConrad 21:47, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
  • A more careful ispection of googel search results shows about 160 unique pages with no serious content, only copycats of someone's silly coinage. mikka (t) 22:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I saw a number of porn sites in the results, but looking further on I found a number of lists of fetishes and/or unusual words, with this word in it. They did not all have exactly the same set of words, so they did not all appear to be derived from one another. I don't believe this is a silly coinage. It is from the Greek νανος, dwarf, and φιλία, love of, fondness for. Try this Google search. --DavidConrad 05:18, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.