Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIASOM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower ^háblame 10:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NIASOM

after first sentence, apparent commercial/advertising content for management school ERcheck 23:19, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Per nomination. Creator deleted earlier speedy delete. ERcheck
• Delete. Per nomination. --Ezeu 23:23, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

I think much of policy issues are addressed during last edit. The readers may find some unique features which the world is entitled to know. Wikipedia can certainly not provide any benefit as an advertisement media by any heuristics. If delete you must do so - the author has the sense of attachable detachment. Author KCM

• Recent edits have not served to make article notable. "unique features withc the world is entitled to know..." and "...not provide any benefit as an advertisement" seem to be in conflict. (Author KCM of above note is article creator.) Reinforces nomination. Still voting to delete.

It does not contradict - of course as the commentor is independent assessor without any passionate view, I am inclined to respect her/his statement. I think - author KCM is already stated. How delectable is the latest entropical version!!

Bold textThis is information about an institution. why delete. rather more information may be solicited about this institution whose website is www.niapune.com - smohapatra

• delete as per nom Pete.Hurd 18:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.